In Pakistan, on June 2nd, it was noted how Edward Said argued that colonialism stemmed mainly from an imperialist mentality intertwined with capitalist greed for profits. This dynamic continues unabated but has adjusted to fit today’s global landscape. Typically, this cycle starts with conflicts escalating into warfare, succeeded by phases of assistance, rebuilding efforts, and recovery processes. Such endeavors often impose unsustainable financial burdens on the involved countries, compelling them to accumulate debts dictated by creditor states. Hanif Muhammad elucidates this pattern vividly in "Red Birds," illustrating a scenario wherein areas within the Middle East face bombardments before inhabitants are forcibly moved to refugee camps. These displaced individuals receive supplies via aircraft—the very ones responsible for dropping explosives—potentially aiming to uphold appearances or showcase dominance. One could reasonably deduce that these confrontations predominantly affect less affluent regions whereas economically robust zones remain relatively untouched and peaceful. The aftermaths of past colonization manifest in shifting boundaries and contentious land claims unresolved through recurrent military engagements. Engaging parties find themselves increasingly impoverished due to such practices; compelled either to sustain current hostilities or ensure basic survival, they resort to selling human resources and natural assets essentially as commodities. Developed economies subsequently capitalize on these acquisitions, marking up prices significantly.
A different consequence of war is human displacement, which intensifies suffering and destitution as individuals with limited means fall deeper into hopelessness. Their modest enterprises close down, forcing them to resettle in temporary encampments where life becomes devoid of pleasure and is reduced to monotonous labor.
Civilizations were formed with the aim of eliminating warfare so that individuals could lead more fulfilling lives. Organizations like the United Nations were created to stop conflicts, promoting peace talks as a standard method for resolving disputes. Nevertheless, these organizations' efficacy appears predominantly concentrated among Western countries, whereas Eastern states have frequently been embroiled in war. Consequently, this situation fosters the perception that the East serves primarily as a testing ground where the West can showcase their military capabilities and strategies, eventually leading to dominance over and exploitation of regional natural wealth.
The unending cycle of conflicts and the resulting suffering and destitution continues unabated, turning once-thriving countries into ruins. Notable instances can be seen in regions like Libya, Egypt, Syria, Palestine, Afghanistan, among numerous others. In Southern Asia, India and Pakistan have engaged in as many as four or five wars due to disputes over Kashmir and unresolved border issues inherited from previous colonial rulers. These military engagements come at the expense of both nations' developmental goals. Moreover, these states frequently assume subordinate roles to secure backing from Western powers for advanced technologies and weaponry. Instead of investing in social and political advancements for their citizens, valuable resources are squandered on warfare. Consequently, armed confrontations and economic exchanges now serve as instruments to uphold dominance, fostering a contemporary version of subjugation masked beneath diplomatic and commercial dealings.
Alongside conflicts, Americans now advocate another principle: trading rather than fighting, seen as a promising concept for maintaining global stability. Nevertheless, they continue to sell arms and military equipment valued at billions of dollars to various affluent but unstable countries worldwide. Could this massive supply of weaponry encourage dominant powers to exert pressure on weaker neighboring states? Should commerce be prioritized, investments in warfare tools ought to yield to fostering peaceful exchanges through trade. When trade becomes entangled with shifts in influence, protracted periods of strife seem inevitable. Rather than peddling armaments for disputes, efforts should focus on safeguarding trade channels and marketplaces to fully capitalize on globalization’s advantages. Establishing such secure frameworks would empower all humankind since each country possesses distinct assets that could benefit others lacking these resources. Moreover, we should channel our attentions and strengths toward innovations enhancing wellness, endurance, and affluence across all regions. Developed Western societies might mitigate past imperialism-related remorse by disseminating advanced tech knowledge, notably concerning eco-management and protection measures, to underdeveloped lands. Facing imminent ecological catastrophes, reallocating funds and expertise away from battlefields toward remedying environmental harm presents feasible solutions.
It is now essential for the East to listen to the aspirations of its populace and address conflicts via negotiation and conversation, thus protecting itself against contemporary forms of colonialism.
Post a Comment